Court hears evidence on Tanzania reps to EALA case

Court hears evidence on Tanzania reps to EALA case
IPPmedia
The East African Court of Justice (EACJ) First Instance Division heard evidence from two witnesses of the Applicant-Anthony Calist Komu on a matter concerning elections of representatives of Tanzania to the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA).

IPPmedia

Habari Zinazoendana

11 years ago

Michuzi

19 Feb

COURT HEARS EVIDENCE ON TANZANIA REPRESENTATIVES TO EALA CASE

The East African Court of Justice Arusha, 18 February 2014, First Instance Division yesterday heard evidence from two witnesses of the Applicant (Anthony Calist Komu) on a matter concerning elections of representatives of the United Republic of Tanzania to the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA). The case was filed by Anthony Calist Komu, a member of a Political Party Chama Cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA), against the Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania.
The...

 

9 years ago

AllAfrica.Com

05 Nov

EA Court Hears Case On Expulsion of Rwandans From Tanzania

EA Court Hears Case On Expulsion of Rwandans From Tanzania
AllAfrica.com
The First Instance Division of the East African Court of Justice (EACJ) on Tuesday heard a matter against the secretary general of the East African Community for the alleged failure to take action in implementation of the EAC Council of Ministers ...

 

10 years ago

AllAfrica.Com

18 Sep

EA Court Hears Power Plant Case

EA Court Hears Power Plant Case
AllAfrica.com
Arusha — THE East African Court of Justice First Instance Division on Tuesday heard a matter seeking the determination of a case challenging an agreement signed between Uganda and China to construct 600MW Kaluma Hydro Power plant in Uganda.

 

11 years ago

TheCitizen

14 Feb

Mvungi case investigation incomplete, court hears

Investigation into a case of murdering former member of the Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) Dr Sengondo Mvungi is not completed, Kisutu Resident Magistrate’ Court heard yesterday.

 

10 years ago

Michuzi

Court hears a case against the Government of Uganda on a hydro power unit construction dispute

The East African Court of Justice First Instance Division, today heard a matter seeking the determination of the Court on a case challenging the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that was signed between the Republics of Uganda and China to construct Kaluma Hydro Power Unit 600MW in Uganda. 
The Applicant, Mr. Henry Kyarimpa represented by his Lawyer Mr. Mohamed Mbabazi asked the Court to find that the MoU signed by Uganda and China was an infringement of the provisions of the Treaty for the...

 

10 years ago

Daily News

08 Nov

Police accused of destroying evidence in court case

Police accused of destroying evidence in court case
Daily News
THE government has asked the public to share information with the police force on unlawful activities in the country since it is there for the people. Deputy Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Pereira Silima, told the National Assembly on Friday that the police force ...

 

11 years ago

Michuzi

11 Feb

EAC Directors give evidence in Court over a former employee case

 

10 years ago

Michuzi

28 Jan

Court hears an appeal on alleged failure by Uganda, Kenya and Burundi to make individual Country declarations in acceptance of the competence of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights

 The East African Court of Justice Appellate Division heard an appeal filed by the Democratic Party (Appellant) against the Secretary General of the East African Community (EAC) (1st Respondent) and the Attorneys General of the Republics of Uganda (2nd Respondent), Kenya (3rd Respondent), Rwanda (4th Respondent) and Burundi (5th Respondent).
The matter appeals the decision of the First Instance Division of 26th November 2013 dismissing the case. The case principally challenges the alleged...

 

9 years ago

BBC

Supreme Court hears rendition claim

One of the most controversial cases of alleged rendition involving the UK - brought by a former Libyan dissident - comes before the Supreme Court later.

 

Share